6 Automatic Editing Tools That Will Make Your Writing Super Clean

6 Automatic Editing Tools That Will Make Your Writing Super Clean

Have you ever wanted a magical editing wand?

Just imagine: A flick of the wrist would be all that stood between you and the end of editing your writing. No frustration. Minimal time investment. An amazing manuscript or blog post.

Alas, no such magic wand exists.

But we do have automatic editing tools, which are the next-best things.

Just remember that automatic editing tools are designed to make editing easier, not to eliminate the work completely.

Putting automatic editing tools to the test

During self-edits on my latest manuscript, I experimented with six editing tools, both free and paid, to determine which could be most beneficial to The Write Life’s audience. Besides being an author, I’m an editor, so I also weighed each tool against what I’d look for when editing.

Since editing, which is anything that improves your writing, has a broad definition, it’s not surprising that the tools I tried had different functions, from checking grammar and style, to eliminating unnecessary words, to identifying areas for improvement.

What you want your editing tool to do will influence which one(s) you choose. No one tool can do it all — nor can one of these tools wave away the work and critical thinking necessary for a well-edited book.

An automatic editing tool doesn’t replace a human editor. Because language rules and elements of a good story can be so flexible, human eyes will always be superior to the rigidity of automatic tools.

Here are those six tools, broken into three categories based on function.

[Editor’s note: Some companies offered free access to the paid versions of their tools for the purposes of this test, but all opinions are the writer’s.]

Check your grammar and style

Sometimes, you just want to make sure you’re not making any silly spelling or grammar mistakes.

1. Grammarly

What It Does: Grammarly is a grammar checker and proofreader.

Price: $29.95 per month, $59.95 per quarter or $139.95 per year for premium service. A limited version is available for free, and Grammarly also offers a number of other free services such as a plagiarism checker and various plug-ins.

Who It’s For: Anyone, though most useful for corporate business people and academics.

How It Works: Copy and paste the text into the online dashboard and let Grammarly work its magic. It flags potential errors, gives suggestions and provides an explanation if you need it. There is also a free Grammarly Add-in available for Microsoft Word, along with a plug-in for web browsers.

The Best Part: Grammarly is easy to use and pointed out a vocabulary issue or two that none of the other tools did. It’s superior to Microsoft Word’s grammar checker.

What Would Make It Better: As an editor, I’ve found that many people don’t understand or care to learn the technical explanation for why something’s wrong. Plain language (or as plain as you can get) explanations for mistakes would make it accessible to more writers.

Our Recommendation: Grammarly is best for the final proofreading stage, or for people who want to learn more about the technical aspects grammar. If you’re an editor or strong writer, you might find yourself ignoring more flagged items than you fix.

2. ProWritingAid

What It Does: ProWritingAid analyzes your writing and produces reports on areas such as overused words, writing style, sentence length, grammar and repeated words and phrases.

Price: Free, with a premium membership option for $40 per year that gives you access to more options such as: using ProWritingAid within Microsoft Word and Google Docs; interactive editing; access to more reports; and the ability to review an unlimited number of words. A lifetime option is also available for $140.

Who It’s For: Anyone

How It Works: Click on “Editing Tool,” create a free account, then paste in your text.

The Best Part: ProWritingAid delivers similar results to AutoCrit, and though ProWritingAid has a premium option, most of the areas you’ll want checked are available for free.

What Would Make It Better: Though ProWritingAid checks grammar, I slipped in a your/you’re mistake without getting flagged. I wasn’t overly fond of the website design, especially with its big ads, but its functional and ads are the price you pay for a free tool.

Our Recommendation: Use ProWritingAid in the self-editing stage to guide your edits. It may not be as comprehensive as AutoCrit, but for a free tool, it’s a decent contender.

3. After the Deadline

What It Does: Like Grammarly, After the Deadline is a grammar checker.

Price: Free for personal use

Who It’s For: Anyone

How It Works: Click “Demonstration,” paste the text you want to check, and click “Check Writing.” After the Deadline underlines any potential issues and explains its reasoning.

The Best Part: It’s free! You can also use it on your self-hosted WordPress site, as an extension or add-on for Chrome or Firefox, or with OpenOffice.org.

What Would Make It Better: A definition of passive voice that explains how you construct it grammatically. After the Deadline rightly explains what passive voice does, but it seems to focus only on the “be” verb, which occasionally leads to falsely labeling non-passive constructions as passive.

Our Recommendation: You get what you pay for with After the Deadline. Use it for a final proofread, but exercise good judgment and don’t make every change it suggests — it’s not as sophisticated as Grammarly.

Improve your writing

If you’re looking for a critique that goes a bit deeper, try one of these options.

4. AutoCrit

What It Does: AutoCrit analyzes your manuscript to identify areas for improvement, including pacing and momentum, dialogue, strong writing, word choice and repetition.

Price: $29.97 per month or $359.64 for an annual membership. This includes an unlimited number of words.

Who It’s For: Fiction writers

How It Works: Paste your text into the online dashboard or upload a document and click on AutoCrit’s tabs to see their analysis.

The Best Part: I spent the most time in “Compare to Fiction” tab, which is a comprehensive look at common issues. It highlighted my tendency to start sentences with “and” and “but,” and identified my most repeated words. I felt like I learned something about my writing, and that’s something I don’t think I could say about the other tools.

What Would Make It Better: A more accurate definition of passive voice. It highlights any use of the “be” and “had” verbs, neither of which fully capture passive voice (you need a past participle in addition to a “be” verb), and many active voice constructions were falsely labeled as passive.

Our Recommendation: AutoCrit is great to guide your edits in the self-editing stage. It’s best used for developmental edits, rewrites and avoiding common writing no-nos.

5. Hemingway App

What It Does: Hemingway App provides a readability score — the lowest grade level someone would need to understand the text — and analyzes your writing to identify areas for improvement.

Price: Free online, $9.99 for desktop version

Who It’s For: Anyone

How It Works: Paste your text into the dashboard and scan for highlighted sections of text. The highlighted text is color coded depending on your area of improvement, whether it’s hard-to-read sentences, the presence of adverbs, or passive voice.

The Best Part: In addition to providing examples on how to fix passive voice or complex phrases, Hemingway App also identifies how many “-ly” adverbs and passive voice constructions you have and suggests a maximum number to use based on your word count.

In my prologue, for example, I had one use of passive voice, and Hemingway App suggested aiming for six uses or fewer — which I nailed. These recommendations reinforce the idea that not all adverbs or passive voice constructions are bad, and that’s something other tools miss.

What Would Make It Better: Hemingway App was the cleanest and easiest to use of the free editing tools, but it’s not a grammar checker or proofreader. Even though it’s not meant to catch grammar and spelling mistakes, any editing application that catches those mistakes is instantly more attractive.

Our Recommendation: Use Hemingway App to increase the readability of your writing and identify problem sentences during the copyediting stage, but supplement your efforts with a grammar and spell checker.

Eliminate word fluff

Those unnecessary words and phrases are getting in your story’s way.

6. WordRake

What It Does: WordRake cuts out the unnecessary words or phrases that creep into your writing. It works with Microsoft Word and Outlook, depending on which license you purchase. I tested the Microsoft Word version.

Price: For Microsoft Word or Microsoft Outlook versions, pay $129 for one year, $229 for two or $259 for three years (Microsoft Word-only version). To use for both Word and Outlook, pay $199 for one year, $349 for two years or $399 for three years.

Who It’s For: Bloggers, authors and editors using Microsoft Word or Outlook

How It Works: WordRake is an add-in for Microsoft products and requires you to install the program before using it, though it’s as easy as following the instructions. Select the text you want to edit, then use the WordRake add-in. It uses track changes to suggest edits, which you can accept or reject.

The Best Part: WordRake is as close as you can get to an automatic editor. It appealed to me more as an editor than writer, but it’s great at eliminating unnecessary phrases and words — and it’s those words that bog down your writing.

What Would Make It Better: I threw a your/you’re mistake in to see if WordRake would catch it. It didn’t, even though Microsoft Word flagged it. If WordRake could catch common writing mistakes like your/you’re, their/they’re/there in addition to unnecessary words, it’d be a hard tool to beat.

Our Recommendation: WordRake is a great tool for the copyediting stage. Verbose writers, authors wanting to cut down on editing costs or editors looking to speed up their editing process will most benefit from WordRake. Watch out if you’re running Word on a slow computer: WordRake increases your load time.

Do you use one of these editing tools or something else? What’s been your experience with automatic editing tools?

This post contains affiliate links. That means if you purchase through our links, you’re supporting The Write Life — and we thank you for that!

This post originally ran in 2014. We’ve updated it to provide the most accurate information possible.

Filed Under: Craft
Learn Scrivener Fast

Featured resource

Learn Scrivener Fast

New to the popular writing program? Get up to speed quickly and learn how to make the most of Scrivener with this course.

148 comments

  • I’ve used both AutoCrit and Grammarly (am currently a Grammarly subscriber) and have been disappointed with both. AutoCrit offered some good insights, particularly overuse of words but I found far too many false positives with both products. Reviewing the reports and investigating potential errors as opposed to stylistic differences is very time consuming and it’s frustrating to go through that process only to learn/decide there are no problems. I should mention that I am focusing on fiction and creative nonfiction. I think investment in something like the online Chicago Manual of Style and a rigorous self-editing routine would take less time and be more cost effective. As with spellcheckers, “outsourcing” editing to software can result in flabby language and grammar muscles. When it comes to the final draft of my novel, I’d rather apply the steep fee I pay to Grammarly to hiring a good living, breathing editor.

    • Keith, I think you’re hitting on something important here, that “automatic” doesn’t necessarily mean faster and easier, as counter-intuitive as it sounds. A lot of these tools are good starting points, but not replacements. Nothing beats the human eye and brain.

      Have you used macros with MS Word? I think if you create them to highlight known issues, it would function a lot like AutoCrit (and others) and would be a good supplement to a self-editing routine — one that would easily flag potential words/phrases to address. Especially since you can customize it.

    • Nate M says:

      I was unsure which to use and I found an article comparing grammarly and another software not mentioned here known as Ginger, has anyone tried that?

      • Taren Randal says:

        I have used Ginger and it could not correct the sentence, “I eight my breakfast at ate o’clock.” Even now Grammarly Plug-in is underlining the “ate” as an error. In my experience Ginger is just a waste of time.

        • Aaron R says:

          Hi Taren. Interesting comparison. Have you seen gradeproof.com? I just put your “eight/ate” sentence in there and gradeproof picked it up perfectly!

    • Teth Kidron says:

      I agree! And Grammarly sure has a lot of times when it is defunct! I was trying AutoCrit because of this, and it missed caps at the beginning of my sentences. They are helpful, but too late, sometimes, you may learn that they have failed in some humbly way. Best to use four-five various programs. It seems tedious; give thought, however, to doing it all on your own without these opportunities. Then, it’s not so bad.

  • Thanks so much for the tips! This is a helpful list. I am just starting out on writing my first draft on my first novel. I need all the help that I can get when it’s time to revise. My problem is not having the money for much as I am on disability now, and I honestly don’t have extra to even save at this point. I am curious about Smart Edit. Have you heard of it or tried it? I have downloaded it, but I haven’t tried it yet. I have heard of Auto Crit, and of course, Grammerly. One of the Grammerly writers was a guest blogger on my blog. Thanks for your help. 🙂

  • Shivani Shah says:

    This is a great list. I usually use Paper Rater. It’s free (I’m on a budget), does an excellent spelling and grammar check, checks your vocabulary use, and even checks for plagiarism. I’ve used Hemingway as well but find Paper Rater far better. I will definitely check out some of the others!

    • Thanks for letting us know about Paper Rater, Shivani!

      Heather
      TWL Assistant Editor

      • Nancy says:

        Thanks Amanda, for this great analysis! Shivani, I just tried Paper Rater- thanks for the info. It has some useful information, but you have to be careful not to connect to Grammarly’s ads. I look forward to checking out the Hemmingway app, and some of these others mentioned.

  • AlexKhlopenko says:

    Hey, I’ve been using ProWriting aid for the entire trial period of two weeks the gave and enjoyed it. Yes, the marking system they use is indeed pretty disastrous, but antiplagiarizer is useful when writing academic papers and everything else worked great for writing short fiction.

  • They sound great – I’ll have to check them out! I’m most inclined towards the free ones. 🙂 While I guess nothing beats self-editing, it’s always nice to have some help.

    • It’s always nice to automate some of the work! And these tools will make it easier to spot trouble areas. 🙂

      • Mike Picray says:

        I’m not sure that I could proof/edit my stuff without some kind of assistance. My main tool currently is volunteer readers. My main problem is I get engaged in the story and forget about editing! I suppose in a way that’s a good thing… and some who have read my work tell me that they don’t notice “errors” because the story keeps them moving. I strongly suspect they are just being kind. I’ve also found that starting at the end of the work and going backwards helps with a lot of things. And as a professional I feel that I have to do the best work I can, so I’ll be looking at some of these starting with Paper Rater.

        Another “problem” I have is that I’m not really a writer. I’m a story teller – which is a whole different thing and I approach the writing from a much different angle. And yes… you CAN write an 80k or 90 k word “story.” ;-D

        • Thomas Lewis says:

          You seem to think much like I do. You may disagree with some points, but this all sort of supports my growing understanding that:

          1) Rules are only generic guidelines.

          2) Rules are made to be broken if you understand the rules and why you might choose to break them.

          3) Most of the rules are very basic and generic and were designed to support the cottage industry of Creative Writing ‘educators’ as a way to get the very basic concepts imparted to beginning, unskilled writers. As such, those ‘professional educators’ cling to those rules too tightly and continue to adhere to them mindlessly, even when the writers they are ‘assisting’ have evolved beyond being beginning, unskilled writers.

          4) This means that the intent of the rules may be often completely counter-productive to writers who write well already, and want to write well and write better.

          5) All advice, from seasoned writers, budding writers, SOFTWARE ROBOT SERVICES, and even from Creative Writing ‘professionals’ such as paid Editors should be weighed carefully, and each suggestion should be either accepted or discarded on a case-by-case basis, regardless of the ‘zero-tolerance’ rules, based on the original writer’s judgment, assuming the writer has good judgment.

          6) That is part of the definition of ‘writing skill’, to know how to adhere to the ‘rules’ and to know when not to adhere to them.

          To me, that only makes sense. In society we have ‘the rule of law’, but laws are not enough. We also have courts and judges to interpret the law. I think the same concept might apply here.

          I, though, am still trying to get the understanding of some of the rules, so when I break them, at this point, I may occasionally be breaking them for the wrong reasons, meaning if I want to break them respectfully and with confidence, I need to learn the rules better first.

          • Chidebere says:

            Thanks for these! I hate it when I feel I’ve done something creative, and someone tells me “that’s not how it should be done.” And I say to myself, “who decides how things should be done? Who sets the rules?”

            I’m just gonna go ahead and have fun writing, no matter what anyone says.

  • Very nicely done. Lots of good information. Thank you.

    Grammerly is WAY over-priced; corporate use is all it’s good for.

    I’m going to give ProWritingAid a whirl. Being a starving aspiring writer, it is at least in the right price range. =)

    Thanks again.

    — Chris F.

  • Dena says:

    I use Auto Crit. I liked the previous version [that I paid for] MUCH better. This new version doesn’t give grade level of the writing, which I used. I also agree with the previous commenter in that it gives a LOT of false positives, especially on things that shouldn’t ever come up. For example, yesterday I copied a chapter of my work-in-process into Auto Crit and used the Compare to Fiction – Overused Words tab, which is the one I most commonly use. It flagged 12 occurrences of initial “ing” and 30 occurrences of initial conjunction. For some reason, the program divides my sentences in the middle in odd places, so more than half of those occurrences were false positives. The “ings” and the conjunctions were words in the middle of sentences, not the first word. I review all my flagged items anyway, so I don’t just take the Auto Crit suggestions as required changes, but it’s really frustrating to have paid money for the service, then in the middle of the year I paid for, they make “improvements” and now the program makes mistakes that should be fixable with simple coding parameters [like if the word isn’t following a period, it is not an initial word]. I just looked at the Smart Edit site and I think I’ll download the trial version this weekend and see if it works better for me. Thanks for this informative page.

    • Interesting about Auto Crit, Dena. I must have used the updated version — and the number of false positives is definitely frustrating. The Hemingway App (free!) also gives you a grade level score if you need it.

  • I use Grammarly, and it helps with the initial edits. I like that it interfaces with Microsoft Office quite easily. I’ve used Hemmingway and I like it. By using both, I’m able to catch some things before I send my work off to the editor.

    Thanks for the list!

    • Good idea, Lori; sometimes a combination of tools is the best bet. I’m glad you liked the list!

      Heather
      TWL Assistant Editor

    • Kwei Quartey says:

      Lori, the trouble I had with Grammarly is the limit on how many pages you can upload. I think it’s 60 pp now, before only 20. Another issue is that the export/import process to/from Word can be bumpy, and you can’t add a significant number of words or paragraphs in edit mode, because when you download back to Word, the formatting becomes crazy.

      Right now, I’m not sure if I should just dump the auto-editor idea. I’m a published author, but I think I have some bad habits. I’m not sure if the auto-editor is helping me much.

  • Lee Jackson says:

    Slick Write is a resource that should be on your list. There are plugins for WordPress, LibreOffice, and Firefox, and the author says he plans to create a plugin for Word soon. The site is fast, customizable, and well-maintained, and the author is open to suggestions on how to make it better.

  • Sae Kyung says:

    Nice Blog! I really like this post. Now-a-days grammar and sentence checker tools are playing a very important role. I am always using NounPlus tool. This tool through I improved my writing skill easily. Thanks for sharing with us such an informative post. I will suggest to everyone to follow your blog.

  • Dan says:

    I’ve been trialing EssentialEditor http://essentialdefinition.com/editor it’s very slick and easy to use. Similar to WordRake.

  • Hi, Amanda,

    You and your readers might be interested in the results of an extended comparative study of 20 grammar checkers I did using published sources as test documents. Among other things, I tried to find out how many false positives the checkers delivered and how many writing problems they “corrected” with new mistakes. The checkers in Word and WordPerfect are included. The test documents included more than 360 mistakes and problems in grammar and contextual misspelling (the ones that spelling checkers can’t catch) and another 360+ problems with style (redundancies, tautologies, wordiness, cliches, pretentious and outmoded terms, etc.).

    Spoiler alert: I am co-author of a grammar checker on the list, but the results for it can be ignored if the reader suspects bias. Results for the other 19 checkers are comparable, because they all analyzed the same documents. There are comments about “readability” scores, about the use of passive voice (a necessity in scientific and legal writing), and about beginning sentences with “And” or “But”–all mentioned by your commenters as problems, but all long ago debunked by editors, teachers, and good writers.

    The study is at http://www.serenity-software.com/pages/comparisons.html. I think you’ll find it interesting.

  • Stephen Wolf says:

    I just gave Grammarly a try with a full manuscript and wasn’t too pleased. It kept suggesting I change words into other words because they were similar (like slap into slam or bard into board). The thesaurus included with it has few suggestions for those overly-used words. I plan on checking out some others for that additional set of “eyes”. Thank you for this article!
    –Steve

    • I’m glad you enjoyed the post, Steve. Interesting that Grammarly thought those words were wrong! Let us know if you try any of the other tools on this list.

      Heather
      TWL Assistant Editor

  • Lisa Lepki says:

    Hello – it’s Lisa here from prowritingaid.

    Thanks for all the feedback. We have removed most of those distracting big ads from the free editor. Now that our premium subscriber base is growing, we are much less reliant on those ads to make the free version available. We are working on the website design so hopefully our new version will address some of the usability issues that you brought up.

    Happy Writing!

    • Thanks for sharing, Lisa!

      Heather
      TWL Assistant Editor

    • Daniel Westerdale says:

      I am thinking of trying out Pro Writer Aid for technical writing: requirements documents, progress reports, software design documents and WordPress blogging. I am keen to know if anyone has tried it out for this. I think Grammerly is over marketed and seems very highly priced. I pasted a paragraph into the online Grammerly dashboard and was told I had “two advanded errors” so needed the premium version. That got me thinking of UK alternatives.

      • Lisa Lepki says:

        Hi Daniel,

        Yes, we have lots of users that use the software for technical and academic writing. All I can suggest is giving it a try. You can paste into the online editor for free and it has about 90% of the functionality of the paid version.

        Or, the annual licence is only $35. You can test it out for free for two weeks and see if you think it’s worthwhile. The good thing about the paid version is that it has add-ins for word, google docs and wordpress (https://prowritingaid.com/en/App/WordPress).

        Let me know if you have any questions or need any help.

        Warmest,

        Lisa

        • Daniel Westerdale says:

          Lisa

          Thanks, does the $35 anual license cover WordPress, Google addin and Word addin. Yes I am keen to give it a try as I have a shed load documents to work on

          • Lisa Lepki says:

            Yep! It includes access to everything. The only additional expenses you would ever have would be for plagiarism checks. Otherwise everything else is included.

            Good luck with it!

            Lisa

        • Daniel Westerdale says:

          Thanks Lisa, I will give it a try out today.

          Daniel

        • Mike Picray says:

          Lisa… did Grammerly catch “licence” in your post above? Or does it not do spelling/appropriate words?

          • Lisa Lepki says:

            Hi Mike,

            I’m in the UK and licence/license is one of those annoying words that has different rules in American English versus British English. In American English, license is both a noun and a verb. In British English, licence is the noun and license is the verb. So, you are licensed to drive a car but you have a driver’s licence.

            ProWritingAid doesn’t really mind whether you use American or British English, but its Consistency Report will check to make sure that you are consistently using only one or the other.

            Warmest,

            Lisa

        • What I really like about ProWritingAid is its ability to link into Scriviner. This is essential for me and it does not change the formatting of the orrignal text “once saved”, meaning that it intially changes it in the ProWritingAid for enhanced readability but will revert to the original formatting.
          However, there are many grammar issues that it will not pick up. For example. I ran a grammar check on the below and it failed to pick up on any thing wihin this passage as being incorrect.

          “He children were here to stay. between you and me, there was something hear. I went to the shops and brought a milk. Having gone back home. There was many things that looked like it would be helpful. you’re here to stay. Me think its going to be a very bright day?”

          Clearly there are issues here with pronouns, captials, verb noun agreement, unacountable nouns, possesives etc…

          Having said this, the way it automatically reformats the text ( it will revert to correct formatting once saved ) enables you as an author to pick up on mistakes that you would likley miss. It left-flushes the text that enhances focus as your eyes are not darting back and forth from indented text to left flush etc.

          • Thomas Lewis says:

            Grammarly only flagged ‘hear’, ‘was’, and ‘its’ in that passage.

            All of these services are like well-meaning virtual assistants that also possess a low IQ.

            They are helpful, but not very omniscient. The state of the art is still ‘infancy’, IMHO.

  • Subhamay Ray says:

    Your review of the editing/proofreading tools available free or for a price helped me very much. I did read separate reviews of some of these aids, but your article covers a number of them in one place. I finally decided to buy a lifetime licence of ProWritingAid and I like the fact that it has a Word Add-in that I can use offline. Thanks for the excellent coverage!

  • Owen Marcus says:

    I have used a few checkers. I found Grammarly the best-BUT it continues to crash. After several weeks of doing everything their support suggested, it still does not work.

    It’s one thing to build a good product. It’s another thing to have it run well.

    • Thomas Lewis says:

      I think one challenge for software is to get it to run well on all platforms, especially when they are cloud-based. This may tie in to your issue. I have been running Grammarly daily for 6 months (Mac OS). It has never really ‘crashed’. Occasionally it ‘beach balls’, meaning it can’t process a copy/paste, and I have to reconnect to it. I guess that could be considered a ‘crash’. Maybe 3 times out of a couple hundred uses.

  • Hugo Benjamin Minney says:

    Good article, especially the notes that say when these tools are most useful.
    I came across your page because I’m deluged with adverts for Grammarly, and when I see so many adverts, I have to do some research. I conclude from this that Grammarly is slightly better than Word’s own spelling/ grammar/ Fleisch score, and I’m not going to pay for that small an improvement.
    I’ve used StyleWriter for years. It seems to address most of the above concerns (in the comments as well), as
    1) it identifies the obvious process errors (spelling, grammar), but
    2) before it tries to tell you how to improve, it lets you define your audience and then tells you how well your current piece matches what it thinks your audience will find most persuasive. Examples: How long and sophisticated should the sentences and words be (the reports of a professional association should be a little more demanding than a book for children, or the readers will feel insulted)? Are there Sticky words that slow down your reader or interrupt their train of thought?
    What I particularly like is the graphical report. It can display my whole document in terms of sentence length and sentence complexity, so I can spot the super long and super short sentences, and by clicking on the graphical representation, get taken straight to them to make whatever corrections.
    Of course it isn’t live – once I’ve made a series of corrections/ improvements then I have to rerun the report. And it doesn’t correct for me – I have to make the corrections. But my readership seems to find the results impressive.
    By the way, none of the other tools are live either.

    • Thomas Lewis says:

      This may be not what you meant by ‘live’ (Grammarly does not correct my Scrivener or iBooks Author docs — I have to repaste), and I don’t want to sound like a cheerleader fanboy for Grammarly, but it is ‘live’ in one particular way, which is that it is ‘live’ for me right now, suggesting corrections for this very paragraph I am writing, right now.

      That is a documented feature, but one often overlooked by reviewers. Anything I write on the web is ‘live’ corrected by Grammarly, which can be very helpful.

  • Doug says:

    I use PerfectIt for cleaning up copy (not grammar, but things like acronyms that come before definitions, table numbers that aren’t correct, double spaces after periods, hyphenation consistency, etc.) and like it a lot. It’s a MS Word add-in. I forget the price.

  • While I read about ‘econometric algorithms’ and software writing entire books I still must type all I am then blamed for. Doing it the pretty old-fashioned way, though on a notebook and no longer with a typewriter or handwriting, seemed the way it is to me.

    I tested software, and online software embedded into websites. I found the time learning to handle them is often better invested into either writing or researching, as those skills remain with the author.

    Still thanks for your overview, it is, besides others, an appreciated shortcut to restart research!

  • Melissa says:

    Hi! What about StyleWriter4? Any thoughts?

    Thanks!

  • Abhi says:

    Thus was great. I was looking for editing tools and found at the best time 🙂

  • hey, these were really awesome tools.

  • Sahil kumar says:

    i like your website sir. i got many use full material on this site. Thanks

  • Jacob Bergen says:

    I have used WordRake and Grammarly.
    Wordrake is quite good, it does miss some grammar errors, as said earlier.
    I only tried the trial, so I only had a week.
    I ran through 140000 words in five days.
    I would have liked a longer trial period, I found a week not quite enough to give up 140. 00 for a year subscription.

    I subscribed to Grammarly for a month, 30. 00 worth.
    It was okay.
    If I went over a Grammarly copy of my book, more than a few times, and it kept changing its mind on what I should do. It would give me a choice of words to use for an overused word, and I would choose one, and the next Time it said to use something else.
    Sometimes it told me to go back to the original word.
    Sometimes it said to use a comma, and the next time it said to remove it,.
    It is a huge memory hog.
    I would hesitate to pay the yearly subscription price 130. 00
    I think I will continue to use Microsoft Word, and use my head to do what Grammarly offers,. I will say they taught me to rely on good editing human skills well learned.
    I wasted a Lott of time with Grammarly Word Addon.

    • Laura Zam says:

      Great post! I use a Mac and I’m having trouble finding software that is compatible. Ideally, I’d like something that performs the functions of both Autocrit and Wordrake. In other words, I love the detailed analyses of Autocrit (other programs offer this too, as mentioned above), but I’d really like suggested edits too! Not just correcting grammatical mistakes, but cutting extra words.

      Does anyone know of a program that does both really well? If not, I can use Autocrit on my Mac. Does anyone know of something like Wordrake I can use on a Mac or IOS device?

      Thanks!

      • dave goodling says:

        Did you try Grammarian PRO2 for the Mac? It was the first. Best of them all period.

        See http://linguisoft.com

        • JE Colger says:

          How did it do on fiction? For about $ 50 USD it seems to be quite affordable.

          • Grammarian has selectable writing styles that accommodate your current writing style. “Casual” and “Chat” are two informal styles that work well with fiction. Grammarian has a default “Common” writing style. This is the one I use, and I’m happy with this setting.

            Personally, I can’t believe that people are paying $139 for Grammarly. It’s not worth it. Grammarian costs only $50 and works directly on the WP document. No browser and no internet needed. I guess Grammarly’s social branding with fake news made a brand for it… a social media blitz that seems to have worked.

    • Angela says:

      I also tried Word Rake and after 5 days it crashed my Word program. I could not use my Word program until I unplugged it in the add-in area. The first couple of times I did use Word Rake I enjoyed the flexibility it offered as far as using it in Word. I have also tried Ginger, Grammarly and Pro-write. Ginger was difficult to navigate. And the other two were complicated and messed up my paper. Thank you for offering this blog- I will try the others you mentioned here.

  • Linda says:

    Grammarily is fine for basic writing errors, but breaks all hyperlinks of anything edited on line and causes typed text revisions to appear in odd places.

  • This post is a good find at the right time. If you visit my blog, please know that I transferred all blogs into my husband’s name because he has a book coming out and I could not figure how to separate our blogs ( transfer one). I appreciate the ton of info your research provided and your conclusions.

  • Luis Thillet says:

    What about StyleWriter 4? What are your thoughts? I just recently downloaded the trial version. Looks great but I’m no editor so am not sure if it’s the best option. Also MasterEdit looks handy.

  • Ron Beal says:

    ‘Thanks for all of the information and reviews- priceless!! Looked at one site for recommended products and it didn’t mention any of those mentioned in this review. Good Job. I am writing a nonfiction book on the spirit realm, expanding the information provided in the Bible. Any suggestions of “comparing” this genre for language, audience etc? Would welcome any emails on whatever subjects.

  • Ambika says:

    Both Grammarly and WordRake are expensive tools.

    When using Grammarly, I purposely made grammatical and spelling errors in my content. Grammarly found all spelling errors but overlooked basic language errors.

    I used WordRake for a week. It is not designed to correct grammar or spelling errors–it is designed, specifically, to remove useless words and phrases from the doc that do not add meaning.

  • Dewald says:

    This is depressing. English isn’t my first language and knowing these apps aren’t perfect (“aren’t” approved by Grammarly), makes me want to run for the hills. What is one supposed to do? I don’t have time to read day and night to try and catch up on these ‘false positives’, and I certainly would not be able to spot one even if it smacked me against my forehead — repeatedly.

    So, what is the best way (non-automated), to increase my ability to pinpoint grammatical errors and bad sentence structure?

    Thanks

    • Yvonne Ravenwood says:

      Take some writing classes to improve how you write, then you only need these programs for a light check to your work. Like with photography – you take the best picture you can so you don’t have to edit it after. Good luck.

    • Melanie says:

      Use an online editing service. Try Scribendi. If your docs must be perfect, it will be worth the money.

    • Melanie says:

      P.S. Many good editing services will explain their corrections if you ask them nicely.

  • Elizabeth says:

    I absolutely love Grammarly and Autocrit. The problem with autocrit (paid subscription) is that promises –I think about 1,000 words but it keeps going back to 3 sentences. We had this issue for as long as I can remember but it was once fixed, then I had my computer clean up and had to do a relogging…and I’m back with the 3 sentences issue. Even though I don’t need too many pages loaded at once, 3 sentences are impossible to work with.

  • Poom says:

    Hi, great article, I wish I read this article before I naively went in and subscribed to Grammarly for a year. I know that Grammarly is not perfect, far from perfect in fact, but as a non-native speaker and writer of English, I find it useful to a large extent. First, I do make silly mistakes all the time (there’s no singular/plural and tenses in Asian languages, so these are something I could never fully understand). Second of all, I write scientific journal articles that will eventually have to go through a human proof-reader before submitting to the peer-reviewed process. I used to get complaints from the editor of how it’s annoying to see basic errors I kept making. So I find Grammarly quite useful, it certainly avoided potential scolding from the editor.

    If I could make a wish, I would love it if you could write about the software from a non-native speaker’s point of view. I’m not sure if this is out of your website’s scope and readership. Last thing I want to mention is about learning from your mistakes, the most improtant part of using such software is that eventually you make less and less mistakes. Again this is from a non-native speaker point of view.

    Thank you.

  • Dale Debber says:

    I am appalled that Grammarly decides to tell users what is politically correct speech and what might offend someone. Policeman becomes police officer and spokesman becomes spokesperson. It gets worse.
    I love the gramatical help, I don’;t really need someone else’s moral authority or values shoved down my throat.

    • john graham says:

      Dale, I agree so much. I jut don’t like Grammarly … even its “grammatical help” can too often be a nuisance with creative writing.

    • Taren Randal says:

      I use Grammarly myself and noticed this also. I decided that inside my book I would not bother with being PC, but in the back cover blurb I accepted the PC nonsense believing that once someone is involved in the story they wouldn’t care, but if offended by the back of the book they may put it down.

  • Elizabeth says:

    Scrivener…is a nightmare. I lost all my files to Scrivener. I was told by Scrivener employees not to worry about downloading a new license from the link Scrivener sent to me…wow…what a nightmare. No amount of work from technicians could recover those files.

    EVery writer should know that Scrivener is an unstable app.

    • Melanie says:

      It’s not an app, it’s an online editorial service, and the name is Scribendi, not Scrivener. Two different animals.

      • Agreed – two different peices of software. Scrivener is very stable and is so very much unlike grammar checkers in that Scrivner does not have a grammar check…which strikes me as odd considering the purpose of Scrivner.

  • Suertz says:

    I use Grammarly Premium and to be honest; it does a decent job. I have no complaints. I wish it were a little more affordable, but it is what it is.

  • I use Grammarly Premium and am happy since it catches a lot of little things. (The Chrome Add-on is correcting this post as I write.) After running my chapter through Grammarly, I print it then read it out loud. I also workshop my chapters and find even more when I read it aloud to others.
    Ultimately, I am responsible for my output.

    • James Hindle says:

      So true. Grammarly, or any editor program, is only an aid to a writer. While it can catch a lot of mistakes (not always right, but it gives you a choice), when you’ve finished with the program you still have to either edit again, and again, and again, or hire an editor. No program could become a writer’s final editor.

  • Harriette says:

    I use grammarly as I am writing and most of the time I agree with the changes they suggest. As a writer I believe that I reserve the right of expression,so sometimes I would just ignore it’s suggesting. I am a college professor, so I also have access to another grammar/spell check program. The bottom line to me is that the writer must have a good grasp of the language basics.

  • Daniel Naber says:

    As After the Deadline isn’t maintained anymore (i.e. there won’t be new releases), I thought I’d mention my own software, LanguageTool (https://languagetool.org). Like After the Deadline, it’s Open Source and free, not just for personal use but for any use. Several add-ons are available, e.g. for Firefox and Chrome.

    • Taren Randal says:

      I’ve used language tool, but it needs to be used with another program. It is not sophisticated enough to be used on its own. It does, however, catch some mistakes not caught by Grammarly.

  • Taren Randal says:

    I like the number 13. I know it’s bad luck and all, but I like it.

  • Jose C Moraes says:

    Great post and comments! I’m going to try some of the alternatives mentioned.
    English isn’t my native language. I’m a teacher of English in Brazil and a writer as well (Portuguese and English).
    Sometimes I feel that the sentences I write aren’t exactly what a native writer would choose. The feature I’m looking for most is the ability to recognize grammatically correct sentences that don’t sound natural for a native speaker.
    I’d been using Autocrit – I liked it – but the newest version has an unbelievable high price, (for me, at least) – $59.97/month!
    I’d appreciate any additional suggestion.

    Thanks

    • JP Carsten says:

      I tried Grammerly to edit two drafts of short stories. When I went to save them in my OpenOffice files as OpenOffice documents it balked and would not let me do anything with the work. When Grammerly is allowed to edit a piece it takes over the piece- It is theirs. You will not be able to open such a piece without the Grammerly editor attached. It becomes a Google web page. Fortunately I had made other copies of the pieces prior to letting Grammerly work on them.

      I have since purged my computer of all Grammerly related files.

      Be careful with this parasite!

      • Taren Randal says:

        I use Grammarly too, but I use it with WordPerfect. What I’ve noticed is that it changes or removes formatting codes. This is extremely annoying and I almost did as you said. It may seem like a pain, and it is, but I now copy and past things to the website then copy and paste the corrections to notepad. This removes all formatting codes then I copy and paste it back to WordPerfect. It’s not the best, but it works. I hope that helps someone.

        • dave goodling says:

          Wow. You are right What a hassle and a bother. That really destroys the whole writing and editing flow. Really, I’d look for something else. Grammarly really isn’t that great.

        • JP Carsten says:

          I find the basic version of HEMINGWAY ($10) to meet almost all my needs and is not parasitic as is Grammerly.

        • Thomas Lewis says:

          I am not happy with the fact that Grammarly left-flushes all my text, but I found a workaround.

          I compose in Scrivener (usually) and DO NOT format there. Then I run it through Grammarly (it can’t unformat something that isn’t yet formatted). Then I paste the corrected version into iBooks Author and format there, then run that through Calibre to get a KIndle version.

    • Melanie says:

      That’s a hard one. For written documents, my opinion is that the only foolproof way to ensure that your style is indistinguishable from that of a native is to have your docs reviewed regularly by a reliable native speaker whose style resembles what you aspire to and who is also willing to coach you on the use of idiomatic expressions and other nuances that a grammar/style program will never catch.

      Another trick you might try is to write your document in English, translate it into Brazilian, and then translate it back into English. That may bring to light some issues that you weren’t aware of. You may be oversimplifying your English, and translating into your native tongue may help you become more aware of instances where your native sentence structure is more complex and fluid. Translating it back into English might help you incorporate that natural fluidity into your second language.

  • Eugene says:

    Thank you so much for this article. I love it.

  • Incredibly helpful! But I’ll still use my human editor after using one of these.

  • Kelee Morris says:

    Nothing beats a human editor, but I might give one of these a try just out of curiosity. But writers should never use one of these as their sole editor.

  • Gary says:

    Amusing how so many posters on here write Grammerly instead of Grammarly…

    • Thomas Lewis says:

      Yes, and these are ‘writers’.

      I always weigh their suggestions and advice in a somewhat different light than ‘writers’ who can spell and pay attention to detail.

  • Rachel says:

    I use Grammarly for the main bulk of my corrections. It also helps to Americanise my writing (the novel is set in the US, I am not). After I’ve finished using Grammarly I usually have a quick look on AutoCrit for overused words etc. It’s a lot of work but I feel overall it makes my writing better and I learn at the same time.

    • JP Carsten says:

      I couldn’t get Grammerly to let go of my work. If I transferred it to another location it would also attach the program to the work. I found no way to avoid that. I finally gave up and purged Grammerly from my system. Way too invasive for me. I guess there is a way to avoid or rectify the issue but I found none.

      • James Hindle says:

        I found that disabling Grammarly before I saved the document, made it Grammarly free. Then again, these computers often have independent minds of their own. It may not work for you.
        James Hindle

  • Taren Randal says:

    Before you post several pages of text please make sure it’s on topic.

  • James Hindle says:

    I have used Grammarly and ProwriterAid with Word 2013. Grammarly works well, although, like any writing aid program, I find myself in frequent arguments with it.
    I was looking forward to the extra features of ProwriterAid but found the Word add-in locked the program and would not allow me to close Word. I had to reboot my computer to close Word. I’ve since removed the ProwriterAid program from my computer, and all is well. Now, I would like to get either a favourable fix from ProwriterAid or a refund for my year’s subscription.

  • Carly says:

    Great blog post! Exactly what I was looking for! I’ve used grammarly, prowritingaid, and autocrit. I found grammarly the best for, well, grammar issues. Basics like commas etc. autocrits price increase turned me off. I was a member forever but going up to 29/month was a deal breaker. Pro writing aid does basically the same thing AND bridges with Scrivener which is AMAZING! It’s terrible at checking grammar but works for the other stuff.

    I’m really excited to give wordrake a try. My sentences tend to get wordy. I wish there was a program that would point out issues with sentence structure. Lately I’ve had descriptions that modify the wrong noun. Or prounouns that identify the wrong noun. Like “they” should’ve mean the people in the previous sentence but instead referred to the ropes the people carried. Oh brother. Haha. Anyway, EXCELLENT list! Thanks a bunch!

  • Sakhi says:

    I have grammarly and I love it. It feels like magic. Though it shows all my content in passive as I am writing several books on the go, and one of them is a medieval epic. But yet, combine grammarly, Hemingway, pro writing and a bit of article spinner and voila ! You have a impeccable first draft. It’s best for my blog.

  • Victoria says:

    I would love to find a program that performed these capabilities that worked with Scrivener. After paying for Scrivener, I really do not want to be stuck with using them only with Word.

  • Taren Randal says:

    I use Grammarly and it is checking my grammar as I type right now, but I find that it makes many mistakes of its own. I like the click to correct and using it on web pages like this one, but it leaves a lot to be desired.
    I also use Editor by Serenity software. I consider this to be the best software available to correct grammar, but the user interface is abominable. It also crashes constantly and catches many false doubled words. The most irritating thing about it though is that the troubleshooting guide blames windows for many of its problems.

  • Thanks , I belongs to Hindi back ground, so I always draft my post on Microsoft World to correct silly mistakes. But believe me your post is amazing…..

    • Taren Randal says:

      Case in point: “Thanks , I belongs to Hindi back ground,”

      In the first 7 words of your comment, there are 3 errors. The comma after ‘thanks’ should not have a space before it. It should be “I belong” –subject-verb agreement. And “back ground” should be one word.

      These errors make it obvious that English is not your primary language. If you used all the checking capabilities in word then this shows the limitations of that program. That is why other grammar checking tools are necessary in the first place.

  • Roxanne Corbin says:

    “Many people are disturbed over k ”

    I just used MS Word, Grammarly, and ProWritingAid on a letter that has the above incomplete sentence. The sentence wasn’t flagged by any of the programs. Yes, there is still reason to manually review documents.

    • Taren Randal says:

      When I quoted it Grammarly caught all three. I didn’t notice the space before the comma but the subject-verb agreement and the two word that should have been one caught my eye.

  • Sherri says:

    I purchased a Premium subscription to Grammarly today only to find out that I can’t directly upload my files from Scrivener. They lose all formatting.

    I’ve read through just about all of these comments and have been searching for something that I can use to polish up what Scrivener misses. The grammar/spellcheck is awful on Scrivener. Suggestions?

    • Rekka says:

      Sherri, compile your Scrivener project, outputting to a Word format, then upload that file. If it’s your first time compiling, you may want to review the output file first to make sure it looks the way you want and includes the Scrivener docs it’s meant to.

  • Lucia says:

    I’ve been using Grammarly, and it’s a very useful tool. I’ve written a recent review which can be found on my site.

  • Richard says:

    I’m new to this site.
    I’ve been looking for a good editor and have yet to find one. I’ve been taking courses at Stanford; concentrating on the craft. The courses gave me a foundation but I’m a science major with only English 101 under my belt and need help with grammar and punctuation. Style? I need to read more.
    My present solutions are: Human, Word for spell and punctuation checker and then “StyleWriter “. I’ve just tried StyleWriter for fourteen days and it found style issues with a short story which had been edited by a major literary magazine. Granted, most of the style issues required judgement.
    Note: After Word I used StyleWriter on the above and it made the following comments: Bog: Good; Style: Good; Grade Easy.
    It made the following Suggestions: First sentence: Too many “glue words” try revising. Suggested two alternative words to “required”, preferred spelling to “judgment” (Word didn’t make this suggestion), I interchanged “that” and “which” neither program preferred one word over the other. Finally: possible passive voice “had been”.
    Hope this helps someone

  • There is a writing tool that hasn’t been listed here, Credosity. I am a corporate writer and author. I have been using this great tool for some time now. It not only finds the grammar and spelling errors it also looks at Active Voice, Verb Nominalisation, and long sentences and paragraphs. It even finds that pesky double spacing I had trained into me many years ago and are now not acceptable. It looks at the document based on readability and professionalism. It also integrates with Word and Outlook.

    As a writer, I believe I am good at my craft. But I wouldn’t send a document to any client without having it checked by Credosity first. I recommend this tool to anyone who is writing documents, emails, letters, or even writing a book.

  • Di Ross says:

    I Downloaded trial version of Grammarian PRO2 X? and found it completely useless for my use, as it only uses US English, not International English (British English. Way to many differences in spellings and some grammar differences.

  • Dan says:

    I was wondering if anyone has used PerfectIt Pro by intelligent Editing? Can it be compared with Pro Writing, or is it software that should be used in addition to Pro Writing?

  • Taren Randal says:

    I use about three editing programs, and they are all useful. However, I have found that by circling all my subjects and underlining all my predicates I find many more errors than the software can find. I also analyze the sentences in my book backwards forcing my mind to forget what I already know about what it’s supposed to say. It’s a lot of work, so I recommend using the software first, but forcing yourself to focus on every sentence individually is the best way to edit long manuscripts.

    My book is 75,000 words and 7500 sentences. It has been a lot of work, but I have found about 750 errors that three different programs didn’t catch. The downside of this method is that you have to know grammar yourself.

  • Tim Giles says:

    Microsoft Word will provide the Flesch-Kincaid reading grade level. My experience with these programs has been that none are any better than Word’s grammar checker.

    • Dave says:

      Grammarian PRO2 calculates Flesh, Flesch-Kincaid, and Gunning FOG.

      Flesch-Kincaid is the US government of Defense standard. Gunning FOG is widely used for publications. Grammarian PRO2 is far more advances with readability statistics calculations.

      As a matter of fact, Grammarian PRO2 even graphs the readability as well as human interest of each sentence for analysis.

  • Very nice post! You’ve shared every point in detail and thanks for writing this 🙂 Really a great post.
    Thanks

  • Thomas Lewis says:

    I tried Hemingway today. I could find the free online version nowhere, so I coughed up the 20 bucks, twice what it cost a year ago.

    I have only tried it on a single chapter so far. But it pointed out that I am using way too many adverbs (so I reworded to remove about 10% of them). Not now at the recommended amount, but a significant improvement.

    I cut my complex phrases from 6 to 4, my use of passive voice from 13 to 10 (91 were ‘allowed’ here) and reworded a few sentences that were deemed ‘hard to read’

    This is the puzzling part. While it is helpful to look at sentences with the question ‘is this hard to read?’ in mind, and then reword them to make them better, it is a VERY LOW BAR.

    The sentences that were hard to read might have had only had three clauses in them or less, and maybe 15-25 words. I would assume that anyone with an IQ of 70 or higher would have no issue at all with reading and comprehending them.

    And changing them to get under that VERY LOW BAR would make my writing simplistically annoying.

    it also seems that the algorithm for detecting passive voice is primarily based on detecting the words ‘be’ or ‘was’, and I think there is a lot more to PV than that, and that this leads to false positives.

    So while I find Hemingway a helpful tool, It has its caveats just like the rest of them. $20? One time? Probably still worth it.

  • Thomas Lewis says:

    Here is a prime example why robot style critique is pretty mindless:

    I have a minor character referred to as ‘Lieutenant Stokely’.

    The Hemmingway App flags his last name as an adverb, simply because it ends in ‘ly’. Really? Ernest is spinning in his grave.

    I could have saved 20 bucks by just searching for ‘ly’ and done exactly as well as the Hemingway App does, because that is apparently exactly what the Hemingway App does.

    • Taren Randal says:

      It seems to me that everyone is trying to get a computer to do all the work for them. I use two editing programs, Grammarly and Serenity Editor, but then I print it out and circle all my subjects and underline all my predicates. There just is no substitute for hard work. So the question is how badly do you want your manuscript to be error free? Or how error free do you want your manuscript to be? Writing is not a vocation or avocation for the lazy.

      • Thomas Lewis says:

        I will acquiesce to the benefit of the doubt and assume that is not an insinuation.

        And thanks to Captain Obvious for that important information. No one here knew you couldn’t write well and also be lazy. No one imagined that it might be hard work.

        I would like to think that researching these things on the internet and trying to find tools to assist one is an indication that the people who came here to read this nice, helpful blog are indeed willing to do the hard work.

        I also believe that in certain circumstances you can do better work if you have tools. Go figure. And that is what these things are. Tools, designed to aid the process. Use them; don’t use them.

        I don’t consider them a swerve towards laziness. Readers will probably realize that there might not be an app that can circle all the subjects and predicates, and there might be a reason why.

        For myself, I don’t need to circle or underline them to be aware of them. I don’t need a tool or even a procedure to do that. But I also don’t pound nails in with my fist, because I believe in using a tool for that.

        So if you’ll all excuse me, I’ve got butter to churn.

        • Lisa Lepki says:

          Hi Thomas,

          Thank you for this reply! It’s brilliant. I love your comment about not using your fist to hammer nails. May we use it?

          All the best,

          Lisa
          ProWritingAid

  • DJ says:

    Hi, I wanted to thank you for providing this info and for all of the posters who added their thoughts. I’m going to try Hemingway and see how it works for the moment. I’ll work my way to the others and see what works best for me before paying. I had AutoCrit and paid for life but now they keep wanting me to upgrade and pay more, which I’m very disappointed to be treated like that when I was promised I’d have it forever, I was not aware it would not include new improvements. I have it still, but w/ the soliciting they send me, it appears I don’t get all the newest upgrades to the program. I have Scrivener and StyleWriter and use StyleWriter most often. I’ve had both for several years and never have had an issue with either of these and techs are quick to help which I love. I have only needed them a couple of times, like when I get a new computer. I never automatically assume the programs are correct, but I like that that they bring possible issues to my attention so I can double check. I tried Grammerly however, it was too buggy at the time and more annoying than productive. I’m working to get back to writing much more, so I really appreciate the info you and everyone has provided. Thanks again to all!

  • Beth says:

    I purchased Grammarly and wish I didn’t. Their software support is tenuous at best. THEY DO NOT TROUBLESHOOT VIA TELEPHONE CALLS and I’ve been corresponding back and forth for a week with no solution. Loading, not starting, Im not the least bit happy.

  • Pamela B says:

    I have a student who swears by Grammarly, so I checked it out, but I have a major problem with the massive volume of unsolicited emails that Grammarly sends out after you sign up for it.

    After reading this article, I also looked at “After the Deadline” and “Hemingway Editor.” I pasted in a couple of college documents that have zero errors. Both programs flagged things as errors that are not really errors, making arbitrary assumptions that all adverbs are bad, for instance, or that it’s always better to use the word “place” than “position.”

    The most interesting aspect to me was learning details about readability from Hemingway Editor. I checked to see if the same readability details are available in Microsoft Word. They are. You have to check “Show readability statistics” in your proofing options. I believe that Microsoft Word is hands-down the best proofing tool for text editing. Get yourself a writing handbook for reference when you need to know about commas or whatever.

Speak Your Mind

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *